I started using OSSN about 3 years ago when it was OSSN 5.0. I felt it was the best social networking software to make of use of because it was called open source and came with the potential to be built up to be godlike among social networking schemas. I overlooked the misspellings, the improper grammar, and the like because I believed in the quality of what seemed like a nice swiss-made watch of a thing. Now some 3 years later I am out thousands of dollars worth of time, and investment and left with a product that I can't get support for unless I upgrade to 6.6 and lose years of good solid customizations of what I thought was open source software. The project "owner" Arsalan has indicated that this product of his is not "open source" but rather closed source and proprietary when purchased as a premium product. What should I say? I will keep working to make my version of OSSN 5.6 work to the best of my ability. I will continue to post components to my github for those of you who are like me to use and make changes to. I am sorry I can't upgrade to OSSN 6.6 despite having already paid for it. The upgrade fails, the primary buttons don't work, and I keep having to fall back to 5.6 time and time again. I wish it would work, but something isn't quite right with my dedicated server service or something along those lines. I'll probably try to upgrade one last time in the future, 3rd times a charm right? Regardless, I am taken aback that the creator of OSSN has decided to say that it isn't really an open source software option. I would like an apology before this topic gets closed. More so, I would like the OSSN community to respond as a whole. This is open source! Is it not?